Since 2000 · CCNY

Our history

Founded in the year 2000, we have long-since been a serious team at City College where students get hands-on aerospace experience. We have grown in size and steadily climbed the rankings of the DBF competition.

12aircraft completed to date
30+students on the team each year
5thour best Detailed Design Report ranking, of 101 teams.
29th2026 Design Proposal rank, of 175 teams

Season by season

See how our team has evolved over the years. Yellow highlights represent significant milestones. Hover over a year to read more.

Highlight Fly-off result Report or proposal result Ranks are shown as place out of teams.

2000–2007 Early years

2000

Club founded

Founding

The City College chapter of AIAA Design/Build/Fly begins.

2001

CityHawk

The first aircraft in our records, named CityHawk.

2002

Falcon I

Fly-off 26/35

Our first fly-off in the records: 26th of 35 teams.

Fly-off rank: 26 of 35
1stlast
2004

Report ranked 12th of 37

Report highlight
Fly-off 28/37Report 12/37

The design report ranked 12th of 37 teams, in the top third of the field, while the aircraft placed 28th at the fly-off.

Fly-off rank: 28 of 37
1stlast
2005

Special Delivery

The team's aircraft this year was named Special Delivery.

2006

Spartan

Fly-off 37/49

Placed 37th of 49 teams at the fly-off.

Fly-off rank: 37 of 49
1stlast
2007

Infinite Janus

Fly-off 29/50Report 16/50

Placed 29th of 50 teams at the fly-off, with a report ranked 16th of 50.

Fly-off rank: 29 of 50
1stlast

2010–2015 Finding our footing

2010

Aphrodite (Αφροδιτη)

Fly-off 39/69

Placed 39th of 69 teams at the fly-off.

Fly-off rank: 39 of 69
1stlast
2011

CCNY UAV

Fly-off 34/82

Placed 34th of 82 teams at the fly-off.

Fly-off rank: 34 of 82
1stlast
2012

Report ranked 20th of 68

Report 20/68

Our report placed 20th of 68 teams.

2013

Fly-off and report

Fly-off 51/81Report 36/81

Placed 51st of 81 teams at the fly-off, with a report ranked 36th of 81.

Fly-off rank: 51 of 81
1stlast
2014

Report ranked 18th of 80

Fly-off 38/80Report 18/80

The report moved from 36th to 18th in a single year, and the aircraft placed 38th of 80 teams at the fly-off.

Fly-off rank: 38 of 80
1stlast
2015

Flying Beaver

Report highlight
Fly-off 57/84Report 15/84

The report scored 92.00 and ranked 15th of 84 teams. The aircraft placed 57th at the fly-off.

Fly-off rank: 57 of 84
1stlast

2020–2021 A breakout report and a return

2020

Brolic Beaver

Best ranking
Report 5/101

The fly-off was cancelled, so teams were ranked on report score alone, calculated the same way as in previous years. Our report placed 5th of 101 teams, the best ranking in our records.

2021

Back at the fly-off

Highlight
Fly-off 36/92Proposal 16/100+
2021: The team back at the fly-off

Placed 36th of 92 teams, with a proposal ranked 16th of more than 100 submissions. The team spent $3,141.70 and raised $776.

Fly-off rank: 36 of 92
1stlast

2023–today The climb

2023

Proposal ranked 40th of 135

Proposal 40/135
2023: The team's 2023 aircraft

Our proposal placed 40th of 135 submissions.

2024

Proposal ranked 16th of 149

Highlight
Fly-off 80/107Proposal 16/149
2024: The team's 2024 aircraft

The proposal rose to 16th of 149 submissions. The aircraft placed 80th of 107 teams at the fly-off.

Fly-off rank: 80 of 107
1stlast
2025

Beaver X-1STP

Fly-off 71/112
2025: The Beaver X-1STP

Team Beaver Works built the X-1 supersonic test plane, which deployed an autonomous glider, and moved up nine places to 71st of 112 teams. The team raised and spent about $10,000 out of pocket to attend.

Fly-off rank: 71 of 112
1stlast
2026

The Duckrivative

Highlight
Proposal 29/175

The Broke Beavers' design proposal jumped 64 places in a year, from 93rd to 29th of 175 teams, after the team wrote its own simulator and ran 2 million aircraft configurations through it.

Case study: the Duckrivative

The 2025–26 competition asked teams to build a banner-towing bush plane. It had to fly rubber duck passengers and hockey puck cargo, then tow a banner and release it on command.

To choose a design, the team wrote its own simulator, the Lap Optimization & Design Geometry Evaluator (LODGE), and ran 2 million aircraft configurations through it. Sensitivity analysis showed that payload capacity would earn more points than minimizing wingspan, so we built a high-capacity fuselage.

The wing is balsa and basswood with carbon fiber spars. The banner mechanism, payload trays and fuselage brackets are 3D printed, and the landing gear is carbon fiber from a wet layup over printed molds.

Wingspan59.5 in
Fuselage65 in long, 8.5 in wide, 6 in tall
LayoutHigh semi-tapered wing, conventional tail, tricycle gear
AirfoilSD7043
Max takeoff weight19.68 lb (Mission 2)
Planned payload39 ducks and 13 pucks
PropulsionScorpion SII-4035-380 motor, APC 18×12E propeller, 6S 4500 mAh battery
BannerRipstop nylon, 118.75 in long in the Mission 3 plan

Be part of the next chapter.

New members join every year, and every aircraft we fly was designed and built by students.

Join the team Partner with us
Design/Build/Fly @ The City College of New York

Grove School of Engineering

aiaa@gtest.ccny.cuny.edu

© 2026 City College Chapter of the American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics